Tag Archive | "Scissor Sisters"

Under Cover – WTF!? Edition, Part II

Under Cover – WTF!? Edition, Part II

           

Special thanks to editrix extraordinaire Jessica McGinley for last week‘s Britney Spears-ified Under Cover!

My last few months of writing ‘Under Cover’ have been one big lovefest. But sometimes I feel like balancing things out by tossing in a little sour with the sweet. Never one to shy away from the dissenting opinion, this isn’t just about my need to hate on things every now and then (especially since some rockers make it so hard not to). I’m just trying to keep it real. And fun. And mix it up. For you guys, the readers. And since last time was such a blast, I present Under Cover: !? Edition, Part II. Music crimes perpetrated by musicians who surely should know better may not be punishable by death or even law, but that doesn’t mean we give up our constitutional right to make fun of them. Why, you ask? More like why the fuck not!?

A great song can be a great thing. But a bad cover song is indefensible and may quite possibly be what Led Zeppelin meant when they sang “What Is And Should Never Be”. Like last time, these nonsensical acts generally lead to any, if not all, of the following questions: Are you kidding me? Are you serious? Who the hell allowed this one to happen? Why God, why? As well as: How could you do this to your fans? and How can you show your face in this town ever again? The reactions of listeners vary greatly, but some have been reported as: loss of appetite, loss of will to love music, wanting to burn their iPods, and willingness to move to Amish country. This week I salute , , and Björk, and throw e-darts at photos of , , and the at my dart board. Sigh, did it really have to come to this?

“Surrender” by Cheap Trick (original: 1978)
“Mother told me, yes, she told me I’d meet girls like you / She also told me, “Stay away, you’ll never know what you’ll catch.’ “ Can a song’s opener get any better than that? Cheap Trick‘s “Surrender” is one of the most incredible classic rock songs I’ve ever heard; in fact, it’s so un-fucking-believably awesome that it achieves the rare “So good, I want to blast this song as I drive my car off a cliff in one last blaze of glory” level of brilliance I’ve touched upon in previous posts (see: Guns N’ Roses). In the movie of my life, this is the song I’d play during the highest point of emotional intensity, preferably during some dramatic courtroom scene where I emerge victoriously and everyone cheers. I can’t even name another song in the history of rock n’ roll that touches upon sex, drugs, coming of age, venereal disease, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, the WAC, the threat of communism, and parents rolling joints and fooling around on the couch to KISS records, all in one four-minute song. This track can mean many things to so many different people at once and that’s precisely what makes it universally relatable and genius. Surrender to a war that will never be won? Surrender to the ideologies of your parents? Surrender to the fact that you know less than you think you do? Surrender to the benefit of experience? Surrender to love and sex? “Surrender” is about surrendering to all the aforementioned and more… but, “don’t give yourself away!” As in, it’s possible to buy in without selling out, as long as you don’t relinquish who you really are in the end. This song was to my childhood what The Who‘s “My Generation” probably was to children of the 60′s, except this one turns the “Parents Just Don’t Understand“-type songs around. In fact, it becomes an anthem that sets out to prove that our mothers and fathers were hip, non-parental type individuals before we were around and they just may be way more happening than we care to realize. Or they care to let on.


But let’s not forget the killer music. See, if Tom Cruise had just claimed he was jumping on Oprah’s coach because this song was on his iPod (and not because of Katie Holmes), I’m fairly certain his reputation wouldn’t have suffered and people would forgive that whole Scientology thing. The forceful yet fun drumming and wailing guitars in the beginning instantly draw you into an unforgettably chaotic rock song that was meant for turning up loud and jumping around the room. And then there’s lead singer Robin Zander‘s voice that would sound odd and whiny if heard elsewhere. It may come off stringy and annoying, but in a listenable way that works well with the shrill guitar riffage. But the beauty of the song lies in the lyrics that are laden with historical imagery, life lessons, and rhetorical questions you can’t help but ponder answers to. And the best way to achieve rock n’ roll immortality is to create an unforgettable chorus that will always stay relevant: “Mommy’s alright, Daddy’s alright, they just seem a little weird / Surrender, surrender, but don’t give yourself away, ay, ay, ay.” Ahh, so timeless. I hope future generations still rock out to “Surrender”.

Cheap Trick – “Surrender”

website | myspace

Velvet Revolver (cover: 2004)
Security? Security? Can someone please come and take this awful cover away? Out of the ashes of Stone Temple Pilots and Guns N’ Roses came the phoenix that is Velvet Revolver. Or in the parlance of rock journalists, the “supergroup.” I’ll be the first to admit this was much more musically orgasmic in theory than reality. And what do arrogant supergroups do? Aside from aging groupies, they cover rock anthems. And do drugs. Is it really ironic to see lead singer Scott Weiland voluntarily cover a song that mentions the “Indonesian junk” that’s going ’round? As this is rumored to have referenced low grade heroin, perhaps not such a stretch for Weiland after all. A lot of my problem with this rendition, I’ll admit, is with the band itself. Remember 90′s Stone Temple Pilots and their once virile Weiland with that powerful, deep voice and an ability to exude sex on-stage? Well, throw in a heroin problem and now we’re left with an effeminate lead singer with an irritatingly high-pitched voice and a penchant for guyliner. Weiland’s barely audible vocals are strained and to add insult to injury, the back up vocals are higher to match. The music sounds overproduced and the guitars aren’t nearly as raw as the original. And it’s a sad day when not even the great Slash can save the ensuing mess. I want to like this rendition, but it’s atrocious and unforgivable. To perform a live impromptu version at a concert is one thing, but it’s audacious to record this for their album and make millions. I laugh when Weiland sings “Whatever happened to all this season’s losers of the year? / Every time I got to thinking, where’d they disappear?” because he probably doesn’t realize he’s singing about himself here, specifically. Sorry guys, but I’m going to have to go ahead and file this one under “Cover Songs That Should Never Have Made It Backstage.” Don’t even bother flashing boob, it won’t work.

Velvet Revolver – “Surrender” (Cheap Trick)

website | myspace

“Comfortably Numb” by Pink Floyd (original: 1979)
English progressive rock bands will always trump their American counterparts, and I proudly wave a white guitar, bow down and salute Pink Floyd as one of my all-time favorites. If you want a stellar example of music that is inventive, out-of-this-world, inimitable, and unlike anything that has come before or after, get thee to the record store and request a copy of The Wall so you can listen to “Comfortably Numb” as often as you’d like. I could go numb, quite comfortably actually, if I had nothing on a deserted island but lead singer David Gilmour‘s voice to listen to (and Hugh Jackman to look at). It’s so relaxing. Beautiful. Flawless. Pretty. Inviting. But that guitar solo mid-song is a whole ‘nother story! I recall a best friend urgently calling my cell several times while I was once driving with this song on the radio. I called her back later and said, “Sorry, I just really had to hear that entire guitar solo” and she laughed and understood why it took me 20 minutes (10 minutes to process the whole song, and an additional 10 minutes of reeling post-song) to finish up, regroup, and call her back. How’s that for an understanding friend? But any true Pink Floyd fan can attest to the entrancing nature of their soundscapes. They are, at best, carnivals of sound that completely take over your senses when you listen to them and keep your undivided attention, even after they are over. While “Comfortably Numb” isn’t my favorite, it’s arguably [one of] the best and perhaps most recognizable in their discography. The lyrics are equal parts thought-provoking and peaceful, but they are eclipsed by that monstrous guitar coda that defines the song and sets the outro on fire, even as it fades out. Trust me, this one should already belong in your collection. And if it doesn’t, consider this a public service announcement sufficiently urging you to do the right thing and increase your musical consciousness.

Pink Floyd – “Comfortably Numb”

website

Scissor Sisters (cover: 2004)
Cut! Cut! Can someone please yell cut!? If ABBA and the Bee Gees had the good sense not to cover this, what’s your excuse? How could you butcher a classic song of your fellow British countrymen? God save the Queen? More like God save me from the horror that is this version. The popularity of Scissor Sisters is something I can’t comprehend and quite frankly, I really don’t even want to. If you actually make it through this entire song, I applaud your patience and high tolerance of all that is unbearable and wrong in the world of music. I also question your hearing, but will refrain from judging. First of all, what’s with the beginning riff that so shamelessly pilfers Stevie Nicks‘ “Edge Of Seventeen”. I was actually waiting for someone to start singing “just like the white-winged dove,” but instead this disco-style song pushed me to the edge of wanting to off myself. The protagonist in Albert Camus classic existential novel The Stranger famously blamed the sun’s glare for provoking his murder of a man on a beach. Too bad the Scissor Sisters weren’t around in the early 20th century since I’m sure he could have blamed their music for his transgression and actually had a better case. And I don’t even know what’s worse… the cheap imitation of ABBA? The Bee Gees-like falsetto vocals? The disco music? The fact that there is not even a hint of a guitar, let alone a solo? Or the fact that Pink Floyd gave permission for this song to even happen, making it the biggest UK hit single covering a Floyd song. What?! Pink Floyd and dance music should never share the same sentence, let alone music chart. The only consolation I find is hearing how David Gilmour invited Scissor Sisters’ lead singer Jake Shears to help sing “Comfortably Numb” during some live shows in 2006, but dropped the idea very last minute (read this). Kind of a dick move, but I’m glad Pink Floyd probably came to their senses and realized they couldn’t possibly subject their hardcore fans to disco if they value them at all. I also imagine it would be hard to smoke pot and “do the Hustle” at the same time? But still, what’s more rock n’ roll than a feud and/or a possible fisticuffs? Oh, and the inevitable press coverage. Sorry chaps, but I’m going to have to go ahead and file this one under “Cover Songs That Actually Make Me Wish I Were Deaf.” Ouch.

Scissor Sisters – “Comfortably Numb” (Pink Floyd)

website | myspace

“Hyper-Ballad” by Björk (original: 1995)
Wow, to be the incredible man who inspired such a mind-blowingly creative love song! I’m getting chills just thinking about him. Quite simply, “Hyper-Ballad” is one of my favorite love songs written of all time off Björk‘s album Post, which incidentally is in my “Top 10 Albums of the 1990′s.” To know Björk’s music is to love her. Like, all of her. That means all her quirks, neuroses, general oddness, insane talent, boundless imagination, temper tantrums and questionable fashion choices. Her music will make you experience every possibly known (and sometimes unknown to you before her music) feeling in the spectrum of human emotion. Perhaps a fan favorite and one of her more accessible tracks, “Hyper-Ballad” details her waking up early before her boyfriend and throwing small objects off a cliff to watch them crash onto rocks. She, instead, imagines her body in place of those objects, which makes her only happier to be home, safely waking up in his arms. Perhaps an extreme way to come to appreciate a boyfriend, but the music (and many remixes) makes up for it. The best part of the song is the build-up in intensity. It goes from soft to loud, slow to fast, simple to complex, and when she hits the breaking point (realizing she really is happier in his arms), the song almost takes flight and her happy yelps make you feel like you’re running away with her, back home to your lover, excited and happy to find them there. Her lyrics are so seemingly simple, but they have a much broader focus than they let on. Is “Hyper-Ballad” about doing away with materialism? Thoughts of suicide? Letting go of the past (love) to be fair to your future? Freeing the soul by doing away with the ego and body? Ridding oneself of destructive impulses? Detoxing your life of the things you hate so you can appreciate that which you love? Purging life of the bad and finding renewal in catharsis? I think it’s about all of those things as well, but mostly about all the private thoughts we experience and the rituals we have to do in order to make love work with another person. If you’re less literary and into looking at stunning visuals, check out the Michel Gondry-directed video as it perfectly captures the beauty of this song and Björk’s brilliance. I also highly recommend the Brodsky Quartet version found on Telegram. Not only is it amazing, but it only further demonstrates how versatile, boundless, and inventive her music is. She defies genre classification and basic human comprehension, putting her in a class all her own. Björk is just an incredible force of nature that you can’t help but love, even if you don’t quite understand her.

Björk – “Hyper-Ballad”

website | myspace

Yeah Yeah Yeahs (live cover)
Yeah Yeah Yeah? More like No, No, No! “Hell To The Motherf*#&n No (the remix)”, even. Not many musicians can perform renditions of songs that hit different notes than the original yet can still make it work successfully in their new direction, so unless you’re brilliant at it like José González or Chan Marshall (see: Cat Power) you’re already climbing a slippery slope. Enter Yeah Yeah Yeahs with an uninspired acoustic cover of “Hyperballad”. It’s pretty bad, but the fact that it was performed live (and not recorded as a single) makes it only slightly more forgivable. Frontwoman Karen O‘s vocals are off-kilter, disjointed, out of tune, and quite frankly all over the place. This actually amuses me since Björk herself has made a career out of singing in an off-kilter, disjointed, “out of tune,” and all over the place manner. The only difference is Karen O’s interpretation of “Hyper-Ballad” is painful to listen to, while Björk manages to create aural sex whenever she sings. Not only does this version not do the original justice, but it only reveals how uncomfortable she is singing someone else’s masterpiece. She sounds unconfident, unsure, and the opposite of “owning it.” Had the Yeah Yeah Yeahs took the original material, started over, and created something entirely brand new maybe only then this one would sound better. Haplessly changing notes to try and make it sound different does not a good cover make. All it did was confuse the listener since it just sounds like Karen O herself has no idea what verses she’ll sing next. The beautiful “I go through all this / Before you wake up / So I can feel happier / To be safe up here with you” chorus is supposed to be something to look forward, but not in this rendition. Instead, it only means we’re one chorus closer to the song being over. I feel bad dissing a fellow Jersey girl, but I must. Sorry, but I’m going to have to go ahead and file this one under “Cover Songs That Need To Be Taken To The Country And Shot…Twice.” Stick to the original material!

Yeah Yeah Yeahs – “Hyper-Ballad” ()

website | myspace

Posted in Under CoverComments (1)

Del Marquis (Scissor Sisters) Solo Project

Del Marquis (Scissor Sisters) Solo Project

of is going to be releasing a series of solo EPs through online retailers the first Tuesday of every month from December through April. Each sunny pop EP will be released with a series of episodic videos to expose the seedy underbelly of pop.

The EPs include collaborations with Joan As Police Woman and vocalists . The first EP, “Hothouse”, will be released December 2. The title track addresses how gay rights were used as a divisive tool by the Bush administration and the society of fear his Administration created.

Del and have created a series of digital motion shorts will be released in an episodic form with each EP. The video project has a sci-fi edge that compliments the pop sheen of the EPs . The initial episode that accompanies the “Hothouse” EP features the original track but future episodes will also showcase reinterpretations or Shadows of the tracks. The shorts make up the projects “Shadow” and tell a linear story.

In the first video Del plays a character named ‘Viz,’ shackled as his train speeds towards an unknown destination. Why he is a prisoner and of whom remains a mystery. Viz passes in and out of consciousness, as waking and dreaming are a blur. His memory is manipulated and his identity scanned by a figure in the darkness. As Viz is identified and his visions absorbed, he seemingly becomes an image of his own fear. Be forewarned that there is a disclaimer with the video that it may cause seizures (that’s how you know it’s good!).

The video is currently available for purchase at www.delmarquis.com and www.embryoroom.com. The EP/video bundles will be available through various online retailers starting with the first EP on December 2.

Del Marquis: website | buy “Hothouse”

Digg! del.icio.us

Posted in Music NewsComments Off

Of Montreal – Skeletal Lamping

Of Montreal – Skeletal Lamping

Everyone can relax. has gotten over the break-up and is doing much better this time around. After the high drama and catharsis of last year’s epically dark Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?, Barnes and the rest of have dusted themselves off and returned to the celebratory psych-pop days of old with the anything but . Contrary to its qualifier, Lamping is huge, busting at the seams with ideas, style shifts, and sexed-up enthusiasm. Barnes would appear to have reached the epiphany that the best way to get over somebody is to get under somebody else.

Make that multiple somebodies if his lyrics are any indication. His fauna does much more than hiss this time around as he waxes poetic about doing softcore (“For Our Elegant Caste”) and taking it both ways while doing so, taking ass against the kitchen sink (“Women’s Studies Victims”) and making you come 200 times a day (“Gallery Piece”), among other deliciously depraved acts.

In addition to his renewed randiness, Barnes conveys newfound resolve, while still betraying sincere vulnerability. Look no further for an example of this than the R&B-tinged “St. Exquisite’s Confession,” a contemplative -pastiche where he simultaneously asserts that he’s “so sick of sucking the dick of this cruel, cruel city” while admitting that he’s “forgotten what it takes to please a woman” and that he “thought it was all over, but it all still hurts the same.” He then promises that “that’s all going to change,” and it does when the track crescendos into skittering beats, synths and vocoders that bring his tale of recovery and self-discovery full circle.

Indeed, Barnes’s lyrics alone are enough to make this album a triumph in their frankness, but it’s the frequently shape-shifting music behind them that makes it truly memorable. No retro musical touchstone is left unturned, be it R&B, funk, disco or ‘80s electro. The changes from style to style—often occurring within one song—can be jarring. The schizophrenic opener “Nonpareil of Favor” goes through no fewer than four stylistic transformations during its nearly six minute length, but not one of them feels forced or superfluous. Meanwhile, the climactic mini-opus “Plastis Wafers” successfully manages to incorporate all of the above, alternately shuffling, strutting and percolating while wanting to “know what it feels like inside you.”

Not every song displays multiple personalities. “An Elaurdian Instance” and single/closer “Id Engager” (download) offer radio-ready accessibility without sacrificing any of Lamping’s sense of exhilaration. The former is one of the finer examples of blissed out guitar pop this year and the latter is a glammed-up barnstormer that matches anything from the ‘ debut.

As Barnes proclaims in that number, all he and Of Montreal want to do right now is play with you. That sexy playfulness was sorely missed on the equally good but emotionally harrowing Destroyer, but It’s refreshing not only to see that the gang is up to its old tricks again, but that it has improved them by honing and mixing in some of their newer ones. Just like any good lover should.

Tracklisting:
01. Nonpareil of Favor
02. Wicked Wisdom
03. For Our Elegant Caste
04. Touched Something’s Hollow
05. An Eluardian Instance
06. Gallery Piece
07. Women’s Studies Victims
08. St.Exquisite’s Confessions
09. Triphallus, to Punctuate!
10. And I’ve Seen a Bloody Shadow
11. Plastis Wafers
12. Death Is Not a Parallel Move
13. Beware Our Nubile Miscreants
14. Mingusings
15. Id Engager (download)

Of Montreal: website | myspace | download “Id Engager”

Written by:

Digg! del.icio.us

Posted in AlbumsComments (2)


Like us!

Advertise with PopWreck!

To keep this site up and running, we reserve the sidebar for ads. In that case, put your ad here. All that's needed is for you to fill out this lovely form.

disclaimer

All media content contained within PopWreckoning is meant to enhance reader appreciation for the art and medium. Please support artists you discover here by purchasing albums, attending shows and buying merch.
Contact us should you wish for certain media to be removed from PopWreckoning.

Concert Calendar

Nov 23, 2011
HaHa Tonka @ Recordbar, Kansas City MO

Nov 25, 2011
Thee Oh Sees @ The Granada, Lawrence KS

Nov 25, 2011
Baby Teardrops - Vinyl Release @ The Brick, Kansas City MO

Dec 1, 2011 Now, Now @ Recordbar, Kansas City MO

Dec 9, 2011 Felix Culpa - Farewell Show @ The Metro, Chicago IL
"PopWreckoning is better than Pitchfork." - Shawn Fogel

PopWreckers

Publisher ::
Nick Davis (Kansas City)

Editor-in-Chief ::
Joshua Hammond (Kansas City): email

Music Editor ::
Casey Osburn (Kansas City)

Literature Editor ::
Devon Mueller (Columbia, Mo)

Movie Editor ::
David Womeldorff (Kansas City)

Music Contributors ::
Mary Chang (DC)
Melissa Cowan (Kansas City)
Jeffrey Whitelaw (Kansas City)

Staff Photographers ::
Todd Zimmer (Kansas City) Scott Spychalski (Kansas City)

Music Submissions ::
Music Contact

Movie Submissions ::
Movies Contact

Literature Submissions ::
Literature Contact

Comics Submissions ::
Comic Book Contact

Television Submissions ::
Television Contact